onsdag 13 januari 2010

What is one-way communication?

I participated in a work-shop today whith about thirty engineers, where communication came up as a success factor in this highly engineered project. As I was the representative from the marketing communication department, they all looked at me every time this success factor came up, and it actually took me a while to understand that they meant information. Not communication.

It’s a complicated area and one obvious success factor is to inform people properly so that they don’t misunderstand what they are supposed to do. Information rather than communication.

The difference isn't always clear. There is even a word for one-way communication. How do you communicate with someone that doesn't answear? That’s information and nothing else. I couldn’t help but twitterize this issue.

Is Twitter a forum for information or a forum for communication?
Most people with some Twitter experience would probably say that it is a forum for communication. It is a social media, which means that we're talking communication, rather than information. However, there are numerous twitter profiles, following not one single person, and just use the medium for informing about what they think and do, or even worse just use Twitter to promote their products.

If we for the sake of this blog post could agree that Twitter is a social media though, which would mean communication rather than information, I just have one other question: Why are the people we communicate with called followers? A follower in my mind is not someone you communicate with. Could possibly be someone that you'd inform.

Facebook "followers" are called friends. Linkedin "followers" are called connections. Both these are more communicative. Why not call them contacts? Or connections, but that's already taken.

Ideas someone?

lördag 9 januari 2010

Avatar again... just curious

My last post was about the movie Avatar and its work with social media. This one will just discuss Twitter followers... and Avatar again.

In six months and less than 160 tweets, Avatar managed to get over 20.000 Twitter followers, just discussing a movie that would be shown at the cinemas anyway. It's not like the followers could influence the content. It's not even likely that they'll receive any free tickets or see it before anyone else. It's a movie for heaven's sake! When you've seen it, it's over!

I can understand that Barak Obama has three million followers as he's actually ruling an important country. I can also understand that Britney Spears attracts a lot of followers (even though it amazes me that she attracts one more million followers than Obama himself). But a movie? This will keep my brain busy until someone helps me out here!

Avatar takes social media to the next level

The movie Avatar passed the $1 billion mark last weekend as the fifth movie ever and might well pass Titanic as the movie most seen ever. I haven’t seen it yet and it’s probably a great movie with amazing special effects, but my angle is as usual not on the technical side, but on the wonders of marketing.

With a marketing budget of 150 million USD, you can make a lot of noice on the market place and we’ve been served the regular commercials, ads, the McDonald’s kit, and trailers. What is more interesting though is the use of social media.














The team behind Avatar has understood the necessity of communicating rather than informing. Finding early adopters that will spread the word. Avatar has its own community with news, discussions, blogs, it has a Facebook page with 733.000 fans… Quarter of a million fans on a Facebook page! Of course it also has a Myspace page and a Twitter acoount with more than 20.000 followers. What makes all these people so interested in a movie that does not yet exist?

Of course it’s about expectations. On July 23rd, the first tweet from the official Avatar Twitter profile, saying simply:




Just an announcement, followed by others. While the number of followers grew however, the discussions, retweets and replies became more regular than the announcements. Discussions around Avatar Day rather than information about it. Discussions around trailers and the game rather than informing.

For the rest of us, that don’t have 150 MUSD to play with, we still have a lot to learn from the Avatar way of marketing. Not only did they spend the budget on traditional marketing channels, but put a lot of effort into the mix of new and traditional media in a clever way. Avatar is one of the most expensive movies ever made, but on the bottom line, the revenue will be something out of the ordinary.

I might even see the movie...

torsdag 7 januari 2010

Google turns marketing up side down

Apple really succeeded in creating massive expectations around around the launch of iPhone two years ago. A successful promotion all together, where users were convinced about the excellence of the phone months before they had even seen it. When Google now introduces the challenger Nexus One, my first thought is why they don’t reuse the exceptional marketing success of Apple.

As late as in November, Google denied that they were planning to make their own phone. One month before launch, it was tested by Google employees, but without any confirmations from Google that they were actually presenting a phone.On January 5th, Nexus One was introduced, based on the operating system Android. It will not be sold through any retailers – only through the Apple web store.

Lower price on a premium product
The price on an unlocked telephone is around 500 USD, which is lower than what you pay for an iPhone. Keeping the price down is probably one of the reasons for avoiding retailers, but once again I wonder what Google has in mind. To offer a premium product at a “low” price usually doesn’t provide any sence of quality.

The marketing is also modest – at least when it comes to traditional marketing. Commercials on TV, in magazines and radio will not be selling Nexus One.

Why complicate èveryting?
Why not just copy the success story of Apple – hausse the phone months before launch, give it a high price to make it even more attractive, make it easy to buy in your nearest telephone store and then use the whole marketing budget to make sure that no one will miss that it’s available?

I think that we can just lean back and wait for the next step. Google knows exactly what they’re doing. They are not really beginners in the marketing business! They know exactly how to create awareness around a product. Young people are discussing, asking questions, expecting replies, and want to feel close to the brand they decide to follow.

Thinking of the core business of Google, the web and social media will do the job. The Nexus One buzz actually started out with a single tweet on December 11th:

"Stuck in mass of traffic leaving work post last all hands of 2009. ZOMG we had fireworks and we all got the new Google phone. It’s beautiful"

By chance there is already an official Youtube channel with all imaginable information about how to use the phone, the discussions at Twitter are unflagging and there are numerous groups and pages entirely about Nexus One.

The spring will be exciting and Google will for sure contribute to the redesign of the marketing arena.